In 1963, John Alman of Kent College, Tuaran wrote an article
entitled, "Incident at Pandasan" published in the Sabah Society
Journal, highlighting a stone inscription he saw at the Tamu ground at Pandasan
in 1961.
The inscription recorded the death of one Sharif Omar at 9
o'clock, on Thursday in the month of Shahaban in the year 1911.
According to Alman, after some enquiries, he found out that
the stone was erected on the spot where Sharif Omar and his Bajau comrades fell
during their confrontation against the police force of the Charted Company.
Apparently, the stone also serve as a gravestone as those
who died were believed to be buried there.
Further research by Alman revealed that a survivor of the
confrontation was still alive. According to the survivor, Abd Ghani,
altogether, there were 18 who were killed by the police, including Sharif Omar.
Alman's effort also reveal a local version of the causes
that had led to the battle between the government forces and Sharif Omar and
his men.
The local source recorded the whole thing started when the
government announced a proposal to conduct a survey of the land at Pandasan,
and the villagers resisted, and resulted in a punitive force being sent to
intervene in order to complete the survey for taxing purposes.
Sensing that with the government wanted to use force upon
them, the villagers appealed for assistance from other villages and
interestingly, they received very encouraging responses. There were people from
different tribes, including Illanun, Bajau and Dusun.
Among the leaders still recalled in the local account was
Ali from Marudu, Kelindad from Kukut, Sharif Omar from Kegura'an and Kadim from
Tambilaong. They were well-received and feasted by the people of Pandasan for a
week.
The police finally arrived on the seventh day and a
confrontation took place. The people who turned out in force however, could not
match the firing power of the police's rifles, and Sharif Omar and Ali were
killed with 16 others.
During the mobbing up operation, the police arrested many
and sentenced them to various punishments.
There is also a little bit of magical element in the local
account, where at one point, when the local people were advancing toward the
police with their weapons and their belief that they were invulnerable, the
police could not fire and some ran.
Apparently, it took O.K.K. Haji Arshad, who was then the
chief clerk at Kota Belud to break the spell of invulnerability by taking a
direct aim at Ali and shot him through the head. It was after then that the
police could fire again, and broke up the local's attack.
Sharif Omar and seven of his fellow Bajaus were buried at
the site at Pandasan, and the site was marked by the stone with the inscription
made by Sharif Omar's son.
Official Account :
As the event was a confrontation between the government and
the locals, a government version is also available. It was based on this
government account that most subsequent writings are based on.
Owen Rutter, the apologist for the Company rule, included
the Pandasan Affair as a rebellion.
Instead of 1911 as believed by the locals, the year was
1915. Rutter claimed that, the Bajaus and the Illanuns, taking the opportunity
on the local garrison being engaged in the Rundum Rebellion, decided to carry
out some raiding.
The District Officer, P.C. Brackenbury, who took over from
A.B.C Francis (otherwise known as Francis Bruce, author of Twenty Years in
Borneo) set out with E.H. Barraut, the Resident, with the Tuaran Garrison to
forestall the attack.
Rutter related how the government force soon met up with the
'rebels' along the Bridle Path near Pandasan. The local numbered about 80, were
said to have dressed in white.
Barraut gave warning for the locals to stop advancing and
throw down their arms, but apparently, the call was ignored, and the police
opened fire. After several rounds of volleys, the crowds broke, leaving 18
deaths.
Rutter however, did not provide us with the whole picture,
especially on the causes which had caused the locals to get agitated to the
point of revolting against the government. While it was accepted that the
timing of the revolt did have something to do with the absence of the
government garrison at Kota Belud, having engaged in quelling the Rundum
Rebellion, or at least, the shift of focus by the government to the interior,
other reasons did come into play.
Chief among them was the question of discontentment against
the various taxes imposed by the government. The people were generally unhappy
about the land settlement that the government was introducing at the time.
Ali, the Bajau from Marudu Bay for instance, had been at odd
with the government was wrongly summoned in 1914 for non payment of poll-tax.
He was reported to have inciting the people to revolt for
some time before the Pandasan case. Pandasan itself was in the state of famine,
and the people had been living in destitute situation. Though the area was
exempted from paying land rents, the living condition was appalled.
Though the area was generally inhabited by Bajau and
Illanuns, they also managed to gain the sympathy from the Dusuns who were very
unhappy with the government's heavy tapai-tax.
Many were forced to pay a $5 fine for failing to pay tax for
their traditional drink. Hence, when the confrontation took place at Pandasan,
the Dusuns were there as well.
The official report gave the number of deaths as 23 instead
of 18 as mentioned in the local source. Most of those killed were Bajaus. When
the government force entered Pandasan, Barraut had many arrested and the
properties of the leaders seized. Extra police were also being brought into the
area. Thus ending the Pandasan revolt.
In many ways, the Pandasan Affair had more or less similar
origin with revolts that took place in Sabah at the time, including the Rundum
Rebellion, a general discontent by various policies of the Charted Company,
especially pertaining to taxes.
No comments:
Post a Comment